Academy of Villainy: 7 Things an Antagonist Should Never Do


You don’t really understand an antagonist until you understand why he’s the protagonist in his version of the world. -John Rogers

Isn’t that the truth? It seems like there’s a been a movement over the past couple of years to develop stories through antagonistic characters; make villains as twisted as your heroes are straight and all that. It’s a solid approach because as much as readers are okay with rooting for the good guy, they don’t necessarily want to hate the bad guy. Actually, the less they hate the bad guy, the better the story – this is actually why love triangles are so difficult to write. I think at the start of writing something new, we writers want to see the world in black and white, and we want characters to scream, “I’m the Hero!” and “I’m the Villain!” And it’s okay for them to do that, in the first draft. But the truth is, the more you blur the line between the two, the better the story.

And so, to help you blur that line a little, here are seven things your antagonists should never ever, ever, ever do, all the way from overworked cliches to decisions that just don’t work. Well crafted antagonists should never…

 

Give grand speeches or reveal their whole evil plan

Yes, this is a huge cliche, and for a good reason. We always want to show instead of simply tell, and grand speeches are just telling. Besides, if you need your villain to hand everything to the hero right at the story’s climax, then your hero probably needs some revision. Give the villain page time, especially if his plight is complicated/multi-step. Let him show your readers what he thinks and what he’s doing.

Walk away from physically seeing their plans through

…Especially if they were elaborate. You know how all of the old children’s cartoons are like that? The whole episode leads up to the hero getting pinched, the grand monologue of the villain happens and then he just walks away, usually leaving the final task to henchmen. Who wouldn’t want to see their deeply important plans to their actual finish?

Employ dumb evil henchmen

Speaking of not seeing a plan through, good help is so hard to find.

Be less determined than the protagonist

This isn’t to say that your antagonist shouldn’t be passionate; she definitely should. But the same way a protagonist is going to identify priorities and set out to see everything righted in the world, the antagonist is going to do the same. The two should be equally cunning, driven and invested, matching each other in almost all development points.

Cross lines only for the sake of the story

What I mean by this is that your antagonist needs her own morals, even if they’re different from anyone else’s. It’s important to understand where there are lines that she will not cross, and when the time is right to draw attention to them even if it means reworking material so that her reasoning stands out.

View themselves as the bad guy

Antagonists are just victims who haven’t had their stories told, so they frequently feel a need to impose their existence and ideals on the world around them. Even when stark raving mad or relishing chaos, there’s still some logic that dictates a wrong needs to be righted. It’s just the definition of “right” and “wrong” that are open to interpretation.

Give up

You would think I wouldn’t have to say this, given that you’ve worked on this grand story with a brilliant arc and beautifully developed characters. People don’t just give up on their dreams and goals – they might change, they might get lumped in with something else, but they don’t just vanish. You can’t just get to a point in the story where the antagonist simply crumbles into dust without any repercussions, or shifts so dramatically that they remove themselves from the protagonist’s path.

4 thoughts on “Academy of Villainy: 7 Things an Antagonist Should Never Do

  1. Dawn Ross

    Great points! I think the crossing lines only for the sake of the story is my main issue when it comes to villains. I definitely like my heroes to be really good and my villains to be really bad. But I completely understand the need to make both characters more realistic by adding a little badness to my good guy and a little goodness to my bad guy.

    1. WhitneyCarter

      I think both approaches (pure evil/pure good and half and half) are valid depending on what you’re going for, though pure evil and pure good are harder to pull off. But I agree that doing things that are so obviously just for the plot is my biggest pet peeve. Thanks for reading, Dawn 🙂

  2. Pingback: Academy of Villainy: 6 Things It IS Okay For Your Antagonist To Do | Invisible Ink

  3. The Clint Hennesy

    I once took on this short, 10-minute writing sprint from some guy on Youtube. The goal was to put your main antagonist in front of everyone else in your story to be judged for their doings. You had to write it in first person perspective . It was a very cool exercise because it made me think of my main antagonist as a protagonist instead. :> Seeing this post really emphasizes more on that exercise I did! Awesome read. 😀

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s